This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Davis, R. Articles by van Auken, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Relating Pedagogical Preference of Marketing Seniors and Alumni to Attitude toward the Major

Shekhar Misra

College of Business, Department of Finance and Marketing, California State University, Chico

Stuart van Auken

College of Business, Department of Marketing, Florida Gulf Coast University

Learning styles of marketing students have changed over the years. Changes have also occurred in emphases placed by the American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business, universities, schools, and departments on meeting student learning needs. This study measures the pedagogical preferences of marketing seniors and alumni and relates them to a global attitude toward the marketing major. This approach may be used in any marketing program as a potential attitudinal enhancement mechanism, since key pedagogies can be identified. In turn, the motivation and learning potential of pedagogies can be evaluated. Results indicate an association between in-class activities and overall attitude toward the marketing major.

Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 22, No. 2, 147-154 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475300222009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. B. Chonko A Philosophy of Teaching . . . and More Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2007; 29(2): 111 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Clarke III, T. B. Flaherty, and M. Yankey Teaching the Visual Learner: The Use of Visual Summaries in Marketing Education Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2006; 28(3): 218 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. L. Karns An Update of Marketing Student Perceptions of Learning Activities: Structure, Preferences, and Effectiveness Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2005; 27(2): 163 - 171. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Bussiere Forensic Marketing: The Use of the Historical Method in a Capstone Marketing Course Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2005; 27(1): 61 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. T. Faranda and I. Clarke III Student Observations of Outstanding Teaching: Implications for Marketing Educators Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2004; 26(3): 271 - 281. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. B. Wilhelm The Relative Influence of Published Teaching Evaluations and Other Instructor Attributes on Course Choice Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2004; 26(1): 17 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Taylor, M. Humphreys, R. Singley, and G. L. Hunter Business Student Preferences: Exploring the Relative Importance of Web Management in Course Design Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2004; 26(1): 42 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. Young, B. R. Klemz, and J. W. Murphy Enhancing Learning Outcomes: The Effects of Instructional Technology, Learning Styles, Instructional Methods, and Student Behavior Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2003; 25(2): 130 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Davis, S. Misra, and S. van Auken A Gap Analysis Approach to Marketing Curriculum Assessment: A Study of Skills and Knowledge Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2002; 24(3): 218 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Clarke III and T. B. Flaherty Teaching Internationally: Matching Part-Time MBA Instructional Tools to Host Country Student Preferences Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2002; 24(3): 233 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Clarke III, T. B. Flaherty, and S. Mottner Student Perceptions of Educational Technology Tools Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2001; 23(3): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]