Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Marketing Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ingram, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparison of Traditional and Web-Based Tutorials in Marketing Education: An Exploratory Study

Jillian C. Sweeney

Deborah Ingram

University of Western Australia

Crucial to achieving educational effectiveness and academic credibility is the systematic evaluation of innovative practices. Despite the rapid advance of cutting-edge technologies such as the Internet and the World Wide Web into higher education, this imperative still remains. The present study investigates marketing students’ perceptions of different modes of tutorial that supplements rather than replaces traditional face-to-face lectures. The three alternative modes investigated were a face-to-face approach and two Web-based approaches— one asynchronous (bulletin boards) and one synchronous (chat rooms). Findings indicate that face-to-face tutorials are most highly rated in terms of the effectiveness of the learning environment and several other criteria. While gender and Internet experience did not affect perceptions of different tutorial types, ethnicity did. Findings and implications are discussed.

Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 23, No. 1, 55-62 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475301231007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
D. E. Hansen
Knowledge Transfer in Online Learning Environments
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2008; 30(2): 93 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
J. W. Peltier, J. A. Schibrowsky, and W. Drago
The Interdependence of the Factors Influencing the Perceived Quality of the Online Learning Experience: A Causal Model
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2007; 29(2): 140 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
I. Clarke III, T. B. Flaherty, and M. Yankey
Teaching the Visual Learner: The Use of Visual Summaries in Marketing Education
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2006; 28(3): 218 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
N. Granitz and P. Hugstad
Creating and Diffusing a Technology Champion Course
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2004; 26(3): 208 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
R. Priluck
Web-Assisted Courses for Business Education: An Examination of Two Sections of Principles of Marketing
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2004; 26(2): 161 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
J. W. Peltier, W. Drago, and J. A. Schibrowsky
Virtual Communities and the Assessment of Online Marketing Education
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2003; 25(3): 260 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]