Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Marketing Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Marketing Educator Internet Adoption in 1998 versus 2000: Significant Progress and Remaining Obstacles

Douglas J. Lincoln

Boise State University

Two separate surveys were conducted over a 2-year period to gauge how marketing educators’ use of the Internet changed between 1998 and 2000. Respondents were found to have made significant strides in their adoption of electronic technology and appeared satisfied with their efforts. While most were not expected by their institutions to have Web sites, many did so out of personal motivation. Both those with and without administrative duties see the same significant obstacles to increased adoption: time to learn, execute, and maintain faculty Web sites. Despite the use of Marketing Educators’ Association members as the sample frame, study findings provide an excellent benchmark on which individual marketing faculty and administrators can gauge their own efforts and design future plans.

Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 23, No. 2, 103-116 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475301232004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
L. B. Chonko
A Philosophy of Teaching . . . and More
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2007; 29(2): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
S. A. Nonis, M. J. Philhours, and G. I. Hudson
Where Does the Time Go? A Diary Approach to Business and Marketing Students' Time Use
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2006; 28(2): 121 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
G. L. Karns
An Update of Marketing Student Perceptions of Learning Activities: Structure, Preferences, and Effectiveness
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2005; 27(2): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
S. W. Henson, P. A. Kennett, and K. N. Kennedy
Web-Based Cases in Strategic Marketing
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2003; 25(3): 250 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]