Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Marketing Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kleine, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Enhancing Students’ Role Identity As Marketing Majors

Susan Schultz Kleine

Bowling Green State University (BGSU) in Bowling Green, Ohio

An undergraduate student’s major often becomes an important part of his or her self-definition. A student’s major identifies him or her with respect to certain classes, places on campus, behaviors, aspirations, and with certain other people. When a student selects marketing as a major, he or she is choosing not just to receive the attributes and benefits of the major but also to become something through a process of role-identity development. The more effectively this identification process takes place, the better the outcomes for the student and, potentially, for marketing educators. This article identifies and empirically demonstrates variables that marketing educators can influence to facilitate the role-identity development process. As marketing educators work to attract more and better undergraduate students to marketing, it may be time to pay greater attention to enhancing the identification process that links students with marketing.

Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, 15-23 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475302241003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
M. E. Hill and J. McGinnis
The Curiosity in Marketing Thinking
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2007; 29(1): 52 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
C. Tomkovick
Ten Anchor Points for Teaching Principles of Marketing
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2004; 26(2): 109 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
R. Pappu
Why Do Undergraduate Marketing Majors Select Marketing as a Business Major? Evidence from Australasia
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2004; 26(1): 31 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]