This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hernandez, S. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Team Learning in a Marketing Principles Course: Cooperative Structures That Facilitate Active Learning and Higher Level Thinking

Rider University

This article examines team learning as a comprehensive pedagogy designed to facilitate active learning and higher level thinking. The key features of team learning and traditional learning are compared to provide a rationale for change for both marketing faculty and students. A detailed description of the new pedagogy and the steps necessary for its implementation are presented. The instructional activity sequence and other aspects of the team learning course design are discussed, as well as their role in creating effective cooperative structures. Students from a day section and from an evening section of a marketing principles course reported favorable attitudes toward team learning. Suggestions on how to get started are offered for marketing faculty members who might be interested in the adoption of this new pedagogy. Future research is needed for comparing the effectiveness of team learning to traditional learning in the marketing classroom.

Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, 73-85 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475302241009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Bicen and D. A. Laverie Group-Based Assessment as a Dynamic Approach to Marketing Education Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2009; 31(2): 96 - 108. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. B. Halbesleben and A. R. Wheeler Student Identification With Business Education Models: Measurement and Relationship to Educational Outcomes Journal of Management Education, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 166 - 195. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Van Doren and H. B. Corrigan Designing a Marketing Course With Field Site Visits Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2008; 30(3): 189 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. P. Ramocki Metacognition and Transfer: Keys to Improving Marketing Education Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2007; 29(1): 18 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. A. Williams, R. Duray, and V. Reddy Teamwork Orientation, Group Cohesiveness, and Student Learning: A Study of the Use of Teams in Online Distance Education Journal of Management Education, August 1, 2006; 30(4): 592 - 616. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. Young The Motivational Effects of the Classroom Environment in Facilitating Self-Regulated Learning Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2005; 27(1): 25 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. H. Amato and L. H. Amato Enhancing Student Team Effectiveness: Application of Myers-Briggs Personality Assessment in Business Courses Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2005; 27(1): 41 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. R. Bacon The Effect of Group Projects on Content-Related Learning Journal of Management Education, April 1, 2005; 29(2): 248 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Granitz and P. Hugstad Creating and Diffusing a Technology Champion Course Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2004; 26(3): 208 - 225. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Tomkovick Ten Anchor Points for Teaching Principles of Marketing Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2004; 26(2): 109 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. E. Hansen Using the Voeks Method to Improve Student Learning in Principles of Marketing Classes Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2003; 25(2): 108 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]