Journal of Marketing Education

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deeter-Schmelz, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 24, No. 2, 114-124 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475302242004

Enriching Our Understanding of Student Team Effectiveness

Dawn R. Deeter-Schmelz

Ohio University

Karen Norman Kennedy

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Rosemary P. Ramsey

Cleveland State University

As team projects become ever more common in business and in the marketing classroom, an increased understanding of factors contributing to team effectiveness is necessary for instructors to assist students in realizing the potential benefits of this pedagogical tool. Drawing from a wide base of literature on team research, the authors develop an input-process-output model of team effectiveness. Using data from 85 teams from marketing classes, this model was tested. Results support the positive and direct role of cohesion as an input variable on the process variable of team work. Additional relationships are explored, and the implications of the research findings are discussed with practical suggestions for the marketing classroom.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
P. F. Skilton, D. Forsyth, and O. J. White
Interdependence and Integration Learning in Student Project Teams: Do Team Project Assignments Achieve What We Want Them To?
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2008; 30(1): 57 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
L. B. Chonko
A Philosophy of Teaching . . . and More
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2007; 29(2): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
L. E. Zeff, M. A. Higby, and L. J. Bossman Jr.
Permanent or Temporary Classroom Groups: A Field Study
Journal of Management Education, August 1, 2006; 30(4): 528 - 541.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
K. J. Chapman, M. Meuter, D. Toy, and L. Wright
Can't We Pick our Own Groups? The Influence of Group Selection Method on Group Dynamics and Outcomes
Journal of Management Education, August 1, 2006; 30(4): 557 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
T. F. Barr, A. L. Dixon, and J. B. Gassenheimer
Exploring the "Lone Wolf" Phenomenon in Student Teams
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2005; 27(1): 81 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
D. R. Bacon
The Effect of Group Projects on Content-Related Learning
Journal of Management Education, April 1, 2005; 29(2): 248 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
F. Jaramillo and P. E. Spector
The Effect of Action Orientation on the Academic Performance of Undergraduate Marketing Majors
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2004; 26(3): 250 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
S. A. Taylor, M. Humphreys, R. Singley, and G. L. Hunter
Business Student Preferences: Exploring the Relative Importance of Web Management in Course Design
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2004; 26(1): 42 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
C. M. Wood
The Effects of Creating Psychological Ownership among Students in Group Projects
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2003; 25(3): 240 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
M. R. Young, B. R. Klemz, and J. W. Murphy
Enhancing Learning Outcomes: The Effects of Instructional Technology, Learning Styles, Instructional Methods, and Student Behavior
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2003; 25(2): 130 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]