Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Marketing Management

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Marketing Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smart, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Conant, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mastering the Art of Teaching: Pursuing Excellence in a New Millennium

Denise T. Smart

Craig A. Kelley

Jeffrey S. Conant

Being a marketing educator has never been more challenging than it is today. Student expectations and institutional accountability standards are rising with regard to the quality of instruction. Research and publication pressures continue to increase as colleges and universities seek to competitively differentiate themselves in the eyes of multiple stakeholders. At a minimum, today’s faculty members are expected to demonstrate effectiveness in both teaching and research. Earning tenure, promotion, and above-average merit pay requires excellence in both domains. Much has changed in the past 15 years, and an updated examination of teaching excellence is warranted. This article finds that many of the fundamentals associated with master teaching 15 years ago remain the same today: strong communication skills, use of an interactive style, and asking thought-provoking questions. One major new characteristic, use of technology, is identified and has the potential to become even more important in the future.

Key Words: grading • master teaching • student interaction • student involvement

Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 25, No. 1, 71-78 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475302250575


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
A. D. P. Sweeney, M. D. Morrison, D. Jarratt, and T. Heffernan
Modeling the Constructs Contributing to the Effectiveness of Marketing Lecturers
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2009; 31(3): 190 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
M. L. Meuter, K. J. Chapman, D. Toy, L. K. Wright, and W. McGowan
Reducing Content Variance and Improving Student Learning Outcomes: The Value of Standardization in a Multisection Course
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2009; 31(2): 109 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
N. A. Granitz, S. K. Koernig, and K. R. Harich
Now It's Personal: Antecedents and Outcomes of Rapport Between Business Faculty and Their Students
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2009; 31(1): 52 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
P. Sautter
Designing Discussion Activities to Achieve Desired Learning Outcomes: Choices Using Mode of Delivery and Structure
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2007; 29(2): 122 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
N. Borin, L. E. Metcalf, and B. C. Tietje
A Replicable, Zero-Based Model for Marketing Curriculum Innovation
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2007; 29(2): 164 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
M. E. Hill and J. McGinnis
The Curiosity in Marketing Thinking
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2007; 29(1): 52 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
D. R. Bacon and K. A. Stewart
How Fast Do Students Forget What They Learn in Consumer Behavior? A Longitudinal Study
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2006; 28(3): 181 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
I. Clarke III, T. B. Flaherty, and M. Yankey
Teaching the Visual Learner: The Use of Visual Summaries in Marketing Education
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2006; 28(3): 218 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
S. A. Nonis, M. J. Philhours, and G. I. Hudson
Where Does the Time Go? A Diary Approach to Business and Marketing Students' Time Use
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2006; 28(2): 121 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
G. L. Karns
Learning Style Differences in the Perceived Effectiveness of Learning Activities
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2006; 28(1): 56 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
J. W. Peltier, A. Hay, and W. Drago
The Reflective Learning Continuum: Reflecting on Reflection
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2005; 27(3): 250 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
A. Roy and B. Macchiette
Debating the Issues: A Tool for Augmenting Critical Thinking Skills of Marketing Students
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2005; 27(3): 264 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
R. P. Schlee
Social Styles of Students and Professors: Do Students' Social Styles Influence Their Preferences for Professors?
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2005; 27(2): 130 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
G. L. Karns
An Update of Marketing Student Perceptions of Learning Activities: Structure, Preferences, and Effectiveness
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2005; 27(2): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
N. Granitz and P. Hugstad
Creating and Diffusing a Technology Champion Course
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2004; 26(3): 208 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
N. Ponder, S. E. Beatty, and W. Foxx
Doctoral Comprehensive Exams in Marketing: Current Practices and Emerging Perspectives
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2004; 26(3): 226 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
W. T. Faranda and I. Clarke III
Student Observations of Outstanding Teaching: Implications for Marketing Educators
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2004; 26(3): 271 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
C. Tomkovick
Ten Anchor Points for Teaching Principles of Marketing
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2004; 26(2): 109 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]