|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Reality-Based Learning Method: A Simple Method for Keeping Teaching Activities Relevant and Effective
Louise W. Smith
Towson University in Baltimore, Maryland
Doris C. Van Doren
Loyola College in Baltimore, Maryland
Active and experiential learning theory have not dramatically changed collegiate classroom teaching methods, although they have long been included in the pedagogical literature. This article presents an evolved method, reality based learning, that aids professors in including active learning activities with feelings of clarity and confidence. The reality-based learning method subjects each learning activity to a 4-point framework that is used by the professor in all stages, planning, implementation, and review. Its solid rationale, rigorous standards, and logical applicability are intended to ease professors confusion and apprehension about active and experiential learning. Furthermore, professors will find that they can truly make a difference in their studentstransferability of knowledge, skills, and attitudes from the confines of a classroom to their interactions in the broader world. Finally, its applications are demonstrated in an extended diagnostic approach to the selection of an activity for one specific content area.
Key Words: effective application of course content and innovation
Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 26, No. 1,
66-74 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475303262353

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Saber and R. D. Johnson
Don't Throw Out the Baby With the Bathwater: Verbal Repetition, Mnemonics, and Active Learning
Journal of Marketing Education,
December 1, 2008;
30(3):
207 - 216.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Chonko
A Philosophy of Teaching . . . and More
Journal of Marketing Education,
August 1, 2007;
29(2):
111 - 121.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Ramocki
Metacognition and Transfer: Keys to Improving Marketing Education
Journal of Marketing Education,
April 1, 2007;
29(1):
18 - 24.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Hill and J. McGinnis
The Curiosity in Marketing Thinking
Journal of Marketing Education,
April 1, 2007;
29(1):
52 - 62.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. J. O'Reilly, R. Rahinel, M. K. Foster, and M. Patterson
Connecting in Megaclasses: The Netnographic Advantage
Journal of Marketing Education,
April 1, 2007;
29(1):
69 - 84.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. L. West
Teaching Written Communication Skills in Professional Selling: The Cover Letter
Journal of Marketing Education,
December 1, 2006;
28(3):
205 - 217.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. C. L. Ng
Photoessays in the Teaching of Marketing
Journal of Marketing Education,
December 1, 2006;
28(3):
237 - 253.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. L. Karns
Learning Style Differences in the Perceived Effectiveness of Learning Activities
Journal of Marketing Education,
April 1, 2006;
28(1):
56 - 63.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Peltier, A. Hay, and W. Drago
The Reflective Learning Continuum: Reflecting on Reflection
Journal of Marketing Education,
December 1, 2005;
27(3):
250 - 263.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. L. Karns
An Update of Marketing Student Perceptions of Learning Activities: Structure, Preferences, and Effectiveness
Journal of Marketing Education,
August 1, 2005;
27(2):
163 - 171.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. B. Lopez and R. G. Lee
Five Principles for Workable Client-Based Projects: Lessons from the Trenches
Journal of Marketing Education,
August 1, 2005;
27(2):
172 - 188.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|