Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Marketing Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rawwas, M. Y. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vitell, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Academic Dishonesty: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of U.S. and Chinese Marketing Students

Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas

Department of Marketing at the University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, rawwas{at}uni.edu

Jamal A. Al-Khatib

Department of Marketing at the University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota

Scott J. Vitell

Department of Marketing, School of Business Administration, at the University of Mississippi

Chinese as well as American business colleges are attempting to improve morality of their students due to recent scandals in both countries. This study investigates several beliefs and values, opportunism, and certain demographic variables that might contribute to the academic dishonesty of American and Chinese marketing students. The findings suggest that American marketing students who are young, tolerant, detached, relativistic, less religious, opportunistic, and negative tend to believe that academic dishonesty is more acceptable than do their counterparts exhibiting the opposite characteristics. Chinese marketing students who are male, detached, relativistic, less religious, opportunistic, and behaviorist oriented tend to perceive that academic dishonesty is more acceptable than do their counterparts. The results also reveal that the Chinese marketing students are more tolerant and detached than are the American marketing students, and they are less sensitive to the acceptance of academic dishonesty than are the American students.

Key Words: academic dishonesty • United States • China • comparative study

Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 26, No. 1, 89-100 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475303262354


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
E. Roberts and E. A. Tuleja
When West Meets East: Teaching a Managerial Communication Course in Hong Kong
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, October 1, 2008; 22(4): 474 - 489.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
B. Kimball
Application of Contemporary Literature to Enhance Interpersonal Skills and Ethical Decision Making in Professional Selling Coursework
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2007; 29(1): 63 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]