Journal of Marketing Education

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 26, No. 3, 236-249 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0273475304268779

Academic Integrity in the Business School Environment: I’ll Get by with a Little Help from My Friends

Kenneth J. Chapman

California State University, Chico

Richard Davis

California State University, Chico

Daniel Toy

California State University, Chico

Lauren Wright

California State University, Chico

The incidence of academic dishonesty has been increasing throughout the past few decades. Past research has indicated that business students cheat more than their peers in other disciplines across the university. And, of particular concern to marketing educators, the current research finds that marketing majors cheat significantly more than their peers in other business disciplines. The research results also indicate that students are much more likely to cheat in situations in which friends (versus mere acquaintances) are involved. The study identifies a robust false consensus effect in which the respondents significantly overestimate the degree to which others cheat. Finally, the research investigates behaviors, beliefs, and propensities related to cheating on electronic exams. The article suggests tactical and strategic measures that business schools and their faculty can use to reduce the incidence of academic dishonesty.

Key Words: cheating • academic dishonesty • false consensus effect • marketing students • electronic exams


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
S. B. Castleberry
Prison Field Trips: Can White-Collar Criminals Positively Affect the Ethical and Legal Behavior of Marketing and MBA Students?
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2007; 29(1): 5 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
J. J. Sierra and M. R. Hyman
A Dual-Process Model of Cheating Intentions
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2006; 28(3): 193 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
D. R. Bacon and B. Bean
GPA in Research Studies: An Invaluable but Neglected Opportunity
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2006; 28(1): 35 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]